Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Thursday, 18 April 1985

MANAGEMENT

Synopsis: Communication For Productivity
Letters written to some 7500 Workers / Managers / Union Leaders, following a period of strike / Go slow / Murders (1979 - 1987), at Mumbai factory of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. This direct / open / honest communication led to a remarkable atmosphere of trust between Workers and Management, which, in turn, increased productivity at 3% per year (ave).

18 APR 1985

To:
Dear Colleague

Last week I sent you a copy of an article by S.R. Mohandas. In that article, Mohandas makes  mention  of the  problems faced by  the  management of  NOCIL.  Some details  of NOCIL issue  are   explained  by  Mr.  M.S.   Patwardhan  (Managing Director) in the enclosed news-paper report.

NOCIL has  an  internal union-leadership  and although  NOCIL management   seem   to' have   reached   more-than-reasonable settlements  with   the  union-committees,   committee  after committee  failed  to carry  the  rank-and-file workers  with them.   This  is what  Mohandas  calls  the  "implementing or delivery-capabilities" of  a union leadership in  contrast to their grievance "representation-capabilities".

We  have also  heard of  many  cases where  the workmen  have disobeyed  strike-calls   issued  by   the  union-leadership, whether  internal or external.   So  one point  is  clear: an internal leadership,  by itself,  cannot avoid  situations of confrontation.   Of  course,   it  helps  to  negotiate  with persons  whom you meet  and  talk to  daily.   You understand them  better  and they   understand  you better  -  and  both understand problems better.

So  we  succeed  in  convincing  the  union  leaders  of  our view-point and make  them agree that  our offer is  "just and fair".  So  you passed the  test of  your convincing-ability! But  what  about- their  ability  to  articulate  (not  sell) management-views to workmen at large?

Our  task therefore does  not  end with  "educating" a  dozen persons.    It   goes   far   beyond,    it   is   management responsibility to train/educate/enlighten not  only the union office-bearers but  all the shop-representatives  and finally all workmen.

It was with this in mind  that we started some 3 months back, 2-day   "Worker   &   Productivity"   programmes   for   Shop Representatives.    Our   idea   was   to   cover   all   200 shop-representatives within 10 programmes.   I believe, so far  we have  completed  7 programmes  and  covered 140  shop representatives! Obviously  we need  a far  more enthusiastic response   (from shop-foremen)   in  the  ensuing  programmes (refer enclosure).



And   very  soon,   we   will   have   3  lecture-halls   for worker-education  classes in  place of  existing  one hall  -enabling us to conduct  3 batches simultaneously.  (We do not conduct any programmes  during  July-August-September - being our final quarter).

I do hope you  will see the tremendous  potential of educated workmen  and compete, with  each other  to  see that  maximum number of your departmental workers go through these classes.

                                          
Circulation: DGMs, PMs/APMs, Personnel Managers/Officers             
(All locations). Foremen & Asst. Foremen

H. C. PAREKH

No comments:

Post a Comment